Why this matters
A funnel is only as trustworthy as its event mapping and identity continuity. Running a plausible query against guessed event names can turn missing instrumentation into a false product conclusion.
Agentry’s funnel_3_step blueprint answers a deliberately narrow question: how
many distinct identities completed step 1, then step 2 after step 1, then step 3
after step 2 during the selected lookback. It returns three counts. The agent
calculates drop-off percentages and labels explanations as hypotheses.
What you get
- Three approved, observed events mapped to the product’s actual lifecycle
- Canonical ordered-funnel counts for a disclosed lookback window
- Step-to-step and overall conversion calculated from those counts
- Instrumentation gaps, identity caveats, and hypotheses kept separate from evidence
Walk through it
Where do users drop between signup and first value?
I will use the saved lifecycle definition and observed event names, not the example names from this page.
GET /v1/projects/:project_id/signal-map
GET /v1/projects/:project_id/onboarding
# Require status: "verified"; use live event/property reads for the selected signals.
GET /v1/projects/:project_id/event-names
{
"server_emitted": [],
"analytics_events": [
{ "event": "signup_started", "count": 1840, "last_seen": 1783651200 },
{ "event": "signup_email_verified", "count": 1240, "last_seen": 1783651210 },
{ "event": "first_project_created", "count": 720, "last_seen": 1783651250 }
],
"wildcards": []
}
After confirming these events match the approved lifecycle and have real traffic, fetch and run the current blueprint:
GET /v1/query-blueprints/funnel_3_step
POST /v1/projects/:project_id/query-blueprints/funnel_3_step/run
Params:
step1: signup_started
step2: signup_email_verified
step3: first_project_created
days: 30
{
"rows": [
{
"step1_count": 1840,
"step2_count": 1240,
"step3_count": 720
}
]
}
From these counts, step 1→2 conversion is 67.4%, step 2→3 is 58.1%, and step 1→3 is 39.1%. The data identifies where measured loss is largest; it does not explain why.
The output
Signup funnel — last 30 days
signup_started 1,840 100.0%
↳ drop to step 2 600 32.6%
signup_email_verified 1,240 67.4%
↳ drop to step 3 520 41.9%
first_project_created 720 39.1% of entry
Evidence caveats
- <identity transition, sampling, delayed ingestion, or missing event>
Hypotheses to investigate
- <possible explanation, explicitly labelled>
If a public view is explicitly requested, publish only the same approved
funnel_3_step blueprint with the same params and use the returned
public_url. Publication is a separate reviewed action, not an automatic end
of funnel analysis.
Setting it up
Send the lifecycle events through POST /v1/analytics/ using the public browser
or trusted server credential appropriate to the event source. Use one stable
distinct_id across all steps. If signup changes an anonymous identifier into
a known user identifier, implement and verify the product’s identity-linking
strategy before trusting the funnel.
Do not add events merely to satisfy this page. Start from the business question, define what completed signup and first value mean in this product, then verify those signals through the install plan and live proof gates.
Variations
- “Compare the same three-step funnel across two exact adjacent periods.”
- “Segment the funnel by an observed plan or acquisition property.”
- “Tell me which step is not answerable and the exact telemetry needed.”
- “Render [email protected] with these approved events in exact order, but leave it disabled.”